The OCA Synod of Bishops announced that at the November 2008 All North American Council there would be an election of a new metropolitan for the OCA as a first order of business.
Though the election of a metropolitan is a critically important event at this fragile juncture in the history of the OCA, I want to make but one comment about the role of the bishop in the life of the church which is related to but not the primary issue in electing a metropolitan.
The bishop in each diocese is the man responsible for ordaining candidates to the diaconate and priesthood, and for assigning priests to parishes. This means that one of the prime responsibilities of the bishop is shaping not only the present reality of the diocese but the future of the dioceses and the parishes as well.
The bishop will answer to God for how well he fulfilled this function. He cannot avoid that judgment by refusing to ordain or assign priests – for the parishes and thus the diocese would not survive without priests to enable the sacramental life of the parish to exist. Certainly parishes could exist as places of learning (like synagogues), or places of socializing or socialism. But central to the existence of the parish are the sacraments – the uniquely defining moments and movement of Orthodox parishes – because that is something uniquely Christian that cannot be gotten elsewhere. And though the priest and the parish’s role cannot be limited to the sacraments, the sacraments and the liturgical life nurture and feed all the members of the parish and all that the parish community does.
A major question to ask in selecting a man to become bishop therefore centers not on his liturgical perfection or preferences, nor on his ability to quote canons or remember rubrics. Foremost among a bishop’s gifts must be an ability to discern, choose, nurture, teach, work with, help improve the men who serve the diocesan parishes. The bishop must be an excellent father (1 Timothy 3, Titus 1). Of course our image of the good father has changed over time, and is not quite the same as what St. Paul describes, but taking that into account, the image of the bishop as a good father – one who manages his household well – is still applicable today. The bishop oversees a number of parish families, but his job is to help insure that each parish family embraces the ideals of Christianity. The bishop is not lord over the parish, but perhaps its grandfather. His role is more pastoral than hierarchical in each parish.
As we choose our new bishops, we should ask the candidates about their understanding of their role in choosing, training, selecting and nurturing parish priests and deacons. How do they see their role in helping priests to be good shepherds, and how do they see their role in dealing with the problems that can arise in a priest’s life and ministry. For certainly the bishop’s attitude in these things is going to greatly shape the present and future of each diocese. The issue is not just how the episcopal candidate sees his role as bishop, but what kind of men is he going to choose to pastor the diocesan parishes. This should be a concern of every parish. The election of a bishop has everything to do with the selection of parish priests. And though the bishop may be far away from the life of the parish, the priest is “in our midst.”