See: God Questions His Creation: The Story of the Flood (c)
There is always a temptation when reading Scriptures to try to explain away problems and difficulties to ease our doubts. But in so doing we often have to discard what the text actually says in favor of some explanation of the text. Then the explanation becomes the Scripture and the Scripture becomes simply that on which the inspired writing comments. Orthodox scripture readers will sometimes gloss over the actual Scripture and rush to the footnotes in the ORTHODOX STUDY BIBLE as if the footnotes are the inspired part and the Scriptures are the stumbling block which slow our race to the get to the truth. As one commentator on the Old Testament wrote, “There is tremendous interpretive pressure to raise the valleys and lower the hills, to make the way straight and level before the reader. But a reading faithful to this book, at least, should try to describe the territory with all its bumps and clefts, for they are not merely flaws, but the essence of the landscape” (M. Fox, QOHELET AND HIS CONTRADICTIONS). Source Theory at least takes every word of the Scriptures seriously and looks to discover their meaning without trying to gloss over inconsistencies and contradictions. It makes us read the Scriptures as they are in the received text rather than using mental gymnastics to try to make the text say something that refutes the very words of the text.
As a final note to give us a little more comfort with ambiguity when reading the Scriptures, and to challenge our tendency to drift into literalism, consider the following fact about the Ten Commandments. Even Christians who know little about the Bible have heard of the Ten Commandments. We often think they are ten clear laws which no one can tamper with and which no one would be willing to debate what they are. The reality is that if you compare what modern Judaism claims are the Ten Commandments with what the Church Fathers believed and what modern Catholics and Lutherans believe, you would discover that although all talk about the Ten Commandments, the groups do not agree on what the 10 commandments actually are. The first commandment for the Church Fathers was that you shall have no other gods before the Lord. In Judaism the first commandment simply is “I am the Lord your God” – it is a reaffirmation of monotheism. For Catholics/Lutherans the first commandment is that we are not to put other gods before the Lord nor are we to have images of any kind. In Judaism the 2nd Commandment is not to have other gods before the Lord and not to have images of God. For the Church Fathers the 2nd Commandment concerns no false images, and for Catholics/Lutherans the 2nd commandment is about false oaths. The 3rd commandment for the Church Fathers and modern Jews forbids false oaths, while for Catholics/Lutherans it is to keep the Sabbath holy. For the rest of the commandments Modern Judaism agrees with the list of the Church Fathers, while Catholics and Protestants have a different numbering system. So before we get too upset with the various interpretations of the scriptures, note that in something as fundamental as the Ten Commandments Jews, early Christians and modern Catholics/Lutherans do not all agree on how to number the 10 commandments. This doesn’t alter the text which is relied on, nor does it discredit the revelation. It only tells us that interpretation plays a role in how various religious groups interpret the basics of the faith.
Next blog: Reading Noah and the Flood Through the Source Theory Lens (a)
You can also find Reading Noah and the Flood Through the Source Theory Lens as one PDF document.
You can also read The Story of the Flood as a PDF document