In the Church, Not of the Church?

This is the 3rd  and final blog in this series dealing with the effort of the state to hold a Roman Catholic bishop legally accountable for failing to follow church procedure in dealing with the sexual misconduct of a clergyman as reported in the NY TIMES on 14 October 2011, Bishop is Indicted; Charge is Failing to Report Abuse.  The previous blog is Holding Bishops Accountable for Clergy Misconduct.

A lot of the responsibility for ensuring policy compliance starts with and falls upon the bishops.   Our bishops insist that monarchical episcopate puts all power in their hands.   So too responsibility for what happens falls upon them, and it appears that the state agrees with this and is going to hold bishops accountable for abuse committed by their clergy.   Church leaders failing to follow PSP (even on small issues), being too trusting of the accused and not responding to accusations with urgency are going to find themselves facing criminal charges in America.   These are all exact issues which the Sexual Misconduct Policy Advisory Committee (SMPAC) has been endeavoring to make our bishops aware of.  Bishops according to St. Paul are supposed to be good managers  (I Timothy 3:1-4; Titus 1:7-9) – not just the focal points of liturgical events, but good administrators.   Canon law even requires that bishops have someone help them manage diocesan finances because the bishop is responsible for overseeing (administering) his diocese.  Today, an additional requirement is being asked of them – be effective administrators.   These problems have been brought on not by the world invading the Church but by church leadership not doing what they needed to do within the Body of Christ.  (see Stanley Fish’s Is Religion Above the Law?  for a recent discussion on the complex relationship in America between the church, its doctrines and disciplines and the rights of American citizens).

While some are complaining that society’s interest in clergy sexual misconduct amounts to nothing more than secularism trying to invade the church and destroy it, there is a different reality these folks are ignoring.   What we face in clergy sexual misconduct is that people in the church have encountered evil in the church, hidden under the guise of clerical leadership.  It is abuse at the hands of clergy and then abuse and lies and cover-up from the institutional leadership.  This is a failure of the Church itself.  If there is an invasion of the church by the world it comes in the form of clergy who engage in abuse and misconduct.  We have for reasons inexplicable embraced secrecy and darkness, the devil’s friends, as the very means and methods of dealing with sin.   The world is asking us to lead by allowing light to shine on every operation of the Church.  However, truthfully, Christ is asking us to do the same to protect His flock.  We in the church shouldn’t need the world to tell us to do what is right.  Christ has already told us, but if we don’t listen to Him, He will speak to us through the world.

The Church which is supposed to be a light to the world, which is supposed to convict the world of sin, which is supposed to save people from evil, has shown itself at times  not to be a safe place and has shown itself to be very subject to the effects of the Fall.   This is a stunning failure for the Church; it is a call to repentance for all who have accepted positions of leadership in the church.

And it is not the world attacking the church – the church is being attacked from within, from its leadership which does not resist its own passions and temptations.   People who are or were in the Church and members of the Church  have been abused by institutional leadership.  This is not the world attacking the church, though perhaps Satan, but we have men in the church who are willing to be agents of evil.

Additionally, part of the sickness we see in the Church is that Church hierarchy declares that the Church is equated to and made co-terminus with the institutional leadership.  Thus the leadership no matter how corrupt is the church and so in defending itself and its decisions, the leadership is defending the church (and sinful behavior) against the membership!   The people of God no matter how much Christ embraces them as His own and as His own Body become viewed as a threat to the church (= the institutional leadership).  And so allegations of abuse are often treated as threats to the church.  Rather than the abuse itself being the threat to the church, leadership views the laity making the allegations against the clergy as threatening – as allowing secularism into the church.   It really is sad that the church itself cannot distinguish between what is truly evil and what merely exposes the evil.

Categories of “the church” and “the world” are meaningless in this mess.  The Church is reduced to the institutional leadership and “the world” is expanded to include the laity.

But people in the church who are victimized by clerical abuse are the Church and those who abuse have placed themselves outside of the Church no matter how many panagias they wear.

The church is not under attack from the world, we are not under attack but rather the attack is from within – shepherds who are wolves and who are intent on defending their institutional power and privileges against the people of God.     We are all and each attacked by these offending clergy and bishops; we are not attacked by the victims who expose the crimes. Nor, as a friend added, are we attacked “by the lawyers, investigators, mental health professionals who offer advice on the matter.”   All of these people are working to help and heal the victims and to help the church uphold its high moral standards.

The victims find themselves forced to go outside of the church to find healing, to find safety, to find mercy, to find justice. And again, as a friend noted, sometimes “this mercy and justice will take the form of prosecutions and civil suits.”

That is what is so sick about clergy sexual abuse.   As St. Paul said when one member of the Body suffers, all suffer (1 Corinthians 12:26).   Sexual abuse in the church is a sickness that affects the entire Body.  And even if there is but one case of sexual abuse in the Church, the entire Body suffers.

What has been decided by the state in charging the Kansas City Roman Catholic bishop is that “ministerial exception,”  which Stanley Fish defines as the case law  that “exempts religious associations from complying with neutral, generally applicable laws in some, circumstances”, does not apply when the abuse of children is involved. Ministers, priests, bishops, clergy are not protected from prosecution in pedophilia cases, and now no longer will clergy supervisors, namely our bishops, be protected if in negligently failing to protect children they do not use due diligence in proactively dealing with abusing clergy.  Churches are expected to have Policy Standards and Procedures which proactively protect children from abuse.  Failure to follow these PSP may now lead to criminal prosecution not only of abusing clergy but of the bishops who have the responsibility to oversee them and compliance to PSP.

We are trying to cure the illness, not just cope with it.  We have to work in the Church, as another friend noted,  to remove  any opportunity for the responsible  leadership to make future excuses about what happened.   We don’t need excuses.  We need to allow the light of Christ to shine into every corner of the Church and into every heart of our church members to expose sin and evil wherever it may be and to perform the healing which is necessary for the church to be the Church.

See Also:  Questioning God about Sex Abuse in the Church and Taking a Page from the Old Coach’s Book

This blog series can also be read as one PDF:  Blog Series (PDF).

6 thoughts on “In the Church, Not of the Church?

  1. Pingback: Holding Bishops Accountable for Clergy Misconduct | Fr. Ted's Blog

  2. Dear Father Ted,

    Your words hold much truth about the attack from within of those abusing and getting away with it because they have some position of power given them from the Orthodox Church or they have some protecting force within the Orthodox Church administration. Your pictures of the wolves remind us of these passages the Bible:

    “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. Matthew 7:15

    Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; therefore be shrewd as serpents, and innocent as doves” (Matt. 10:16).

    The apostle Paul, with a deeply troubled spirit and in tears, penned a similar warning: “I know that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock” (Acts 20:29).

    if the bishops declare they are a ‘monarchy’ and only they can police the ranks, yet these wolf like attacks are on going and continue and network with other jurisdictions, and other networks in support of sexual abuse, then we have every right and duty for the love of God and for consideration of “His little ones” (Mark 9:42) NOT to give any respect or authority to those wolf bishops and to remove ourselves from those bishops who are the wolves or who refuse to see the light of what is needed to protect victims of sexual abuse. To often the abusers and those who enable and support the abusers, are using their power to push out the victims who were harmed by clergy abuse in the Orthodox Church. The victims leave ‘for healing’ as you say, because the wolf like nature in which their abuse has been handled forces them out for safety reasons. Healing can also mean so as to be not be further harmed or killed.

  3. Mark from the DOS

    “Churches are expected to have Policy Standards and Procedures which proactively protect children from abuse. Failure to follow these PSP may now lead to criminal prosecution not only of abusing clergy but of the bishops who have the responsibility to oversee them and compliance to PSP.”

    Absolute nonsense. Your actions will either comply with state law or they will not. It is far more correct to state that following a well drafted PSP may protect you from criminal prosecution. Yet, even, so, the question is whether some state statute was followed, not some institutionally created rule. I can’t help but wonder to what end the writer purposefully conflates state law with church procedures, without bothering to clarify.

    1. Fr. Ted

      What you “can’t help but wonder” – what you imagine or speculate or fear – seems to be the basis of your comments. Reacting rather than reading is sometimes an error caused by a deeply held ideology. That sometimes leads to (mis-)reading in order to find fault. I have no idea what your motivation for writing is, you are the one who appears to be claiming you know people’s intentions, maybe you can state your own intentions. It is not clear to me what exactly you are opposed to, nor whom you think I might be misleading, nor what would be gained by misleading someone on this topic.

      Obviously the state arrests people for breaking state laws. I didn’t write these blogs for the state. I am writing for people in the Church. In the Church we need to be concerned about how to protect our children from abuse and from predators. Am I to believe from your comments that you are opposed to protecting children in the church from abuse and predators?

      Within the Church we must work to protect not only children, but anyone who is vulnerable and frail, and in fact our interest should be in making the Church a safe place for all members. The state has as a result of clergy sexual abuse of children in all kinds of denominations and religions tightened its laws dealing with abuse and the effect is to put every more pressure on Church hierarchs, Church PSPs, and parishes to police themselves and become more responsible for preventing abuse and more firm and intentional in dealing with abusers. So internally denominations and parishes are adopting stricter/stronger PSPs in dealing with abuse. The end result is that if we violate our own PSPs we will be violating the law and the state will hold that against us if abuse occurs.

      Thus, as my statement which you quoted says, “Failure to follow these PSP may now lead to criminal prosecution not only of abusing clergy but of the bishops…” Internally in the Church we need to take our own PSPs seriously – enforcing them and having bishops ensure compliance of the PSPs throughout the Church.

      There is nothing misleading about this. The case of the RC bishop in KC is precisely the state holding a bishop accountable for failure to protect children. Internally within the question is did he follow the PSP? Does the church need better PSPs? If we work to try to prevent sexual abuse in the church by establishing sound PSPs which follow state laws, but then fail to follow our own PSPs we in the Church put ourselves at risk now of running afoul of the law. If we are convicted on the legal counts, we open ourselves up to tremendously expensive civil suits.

      This is not misleading. Many churches and denominations have already felt the sting of this. The Roman Catholic Church is perhaps the currently most public example.

  4. dshortimon

    I have observed that the leadership of a church body often considers governance/policing from outside of the body as medling and persecution. However, if we review the scriptures in the Old Testament, our glorious Father repeatedly uses the forces from outside of the church to purge the church of its error and unwillingness to submit to God and live the way that He has determined. When the leadership of the church cannot, or worse, will not, govern and police themselves according to the truths and commands of the scriptures then God will use forces from outside of the body to do it. The church, and most importantly her leadership, are not above the law, but supposed to be the beacons of truth and righteousness.

    Keep up this good fight to expose the dirt in the dark corners of our body.

  5. Pingback: Blogs on Sexual Misconduct in the Church | Fr. Ted's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.