Because you have rejected the word of the LORD, he has also rejected you … (1 Samuel 15:23)
The political polarity and party spirit which so divides America is becoming so deeply ingrained in the minds of some as to cause them even to judge the Scriptures as being too liberal or too conservative. When Christians view Christianity or the Scriptures through a political lens they lose sight of God’s Word as being literally above partisan politics. God’s word is meant to challenge us in our thinking so that we consider things not just from an earthly or human point of view but to also take God’s own viewpoint into consideration.
From now on, therefore, we regard no one from a human point of view; even though we once regarded Christ from a human point of view, we regard him thus no longer. Therefore, if any one is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, behold, the new has come. All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself … (2 Corinthians 5:16-18)
And we also thank God constantly for this, that when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men but as what it really is, the word of God, which is at work in you believers. (1 Thessalonians 2:13)
Today even Orthodox Christians can be heard commenting on and judging the Scriptures or a prayer of the Church or a message from Church leadership not from the point of view of God but from that of a political party. We begin to hear people say that scripture sounds liberal or conservative acting as if the American political viewpoint is the standard for measuring God’s word. When we “hear” the Scripture as sounding liberal or conservative, we have already adopted a worldly mind about the Word of God.
We may not like what we read in Scriptures. We may not agree with it. We may not want to do it, but it still remains as God’s word to us. We have to wrestle with what God revealed.
For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, says the LORD. (Isaiah 55:8)
We have to listen to God’s word and allow it to come deep into our hearts and minds in order to either live it or wrestle with it. Otherwise we are at risk to do and to become exactly what the people were in the days when Jesus walked on earth and He warned them that they had ears but could not hear and eyes but could not see.
When we come into the church, we need to lay aside our political prejudices and allow God to speak to us so that we hear God’s word and do it or begin to wrestle with it. But if we accept as a filter for reading the scriptures a political party’s point of view then we have stopped our ears with partisan politics and we will never hear God’s word.
Roman Emperor Theodosius issued an edict in 431AD at the Church Council in Ephesus. Emperor Theodosius was an Orthodox Christian, an Orthodox emperor and is even listed as an Orthodox saint. The Emperor said:
Although we are always surrounded by the lawful imperial weaponry, and it is not fitting for us to be without weapon-bearers and guards; when, however, entering the churches of God, we shall leave our weapons outside and take off the very diadem, emblem of our imperial dignity.
The Emperor said he and his entourage were to leave their weapons and emblems of the imperial dignity outside the church. They entered the church just like everyone else – as sinners in need of salvation. The only way they could truly hear God was to lay aside all their political thinking, their earthly status and even the signs of their political power.
Today we need to do this by laying aside our ideological weapons when we enter the church, so that we can hear the Gospel. We should Leave our ideological attacks and political grenades and partisan weapons outside the church so that we don’t look at God’s word from an earthly point of view, but rather we enter the church with open hearts and minds to hear God fully.
Whether we are on the political left or on the political right, whether we are politically right or wrong, we need to hear the Word of God and to take it home with us and to judge ourselves based on God’s word. We need to pull the liberal and conservative plugs from our ears and remove the conservative and liberal lens from our eyes so that we can see the world as God proclaims it.
For this people’s heart has grown dull, and their ears are heavy of hearing, and their eyes they have closed, lest they should perceive with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and turn for me to heal them. (Matthew 13:15)
Jesus told us that we cannot serve God and mammon. We cannot serve God if we come to the Scriptures or to the Church to judge God by a political ideological point of view. Listen to God first. Don’t react to what God says until you understand His teachings and comandments.
St. Paul said: For though we live in the world we are not carrying on a worldly war, for the weapons of our warfare are not worldly but have divine power to destroy strongholds. (2 Corinthians 10:3-4)
In Acts 4:15-31, the Apostles were arrested by the temple authorities and told not to speak about Jesus any more. They replied: “Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge; for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard.” Political parties love it if we take their point of view in order to measure and judge the Scriptures and the Church. We however are not to see the world from that human point of view but rather are to view every human point of view from the perspective of God’s own will.
In the Church we must speak the word of God and hear it whether we like it or not. Listen to what God says and allow it to enter into your mind and willful choices. Obey it if that is in your heart, and if not, then wrestle with it and ask God why He says things that you find so difficult to do. Carry His Word in your heart so you can take it into your life and home to become a doer of God’s word.
Fraternized 
Dear to Christ, Fr. Ted, The true conservative disposition is more akin to traditional Christianity than liberalism as we know it today. The term — con + serve — began as a moral point of view rooted in Christendom, that is, learning what to conserve, such as, Tradition in Christianity, conserving the words of Christ, the teaching of the Fathers and Councils, to conserve them from significant change. In this light, the champions of the Filioque break with tradition are more given to a liberal impulse (the break from conserving the past), than holding fast to the traditions. Liberalism quickly evolved a forward looking posture, such as, “progress”, often by repudiating the past. When this view butted heads with Christianity, Christianity lost in the courts, schools, in commerce and economics, in the writing of history, and even in the Christian churches. I think this can all be said without aligning ourselves with political parties, for the so called political conservatives of today are also progressives, concerned with wealth, power (instead of authority from God), and achieving success and greatness in this life on earth. It is a terribly mixed bag, such that this is the limit of my response which with its probable mistakes and omissions, please forgive.
In Christ,
Br. James
Thanks for your words. I’m not disagreeing with you, but just further thinking through your comments. If “conserving” was the disposition of Christianity, in some ways that was accomplished simply by fixing the Scriptural Canon. That preserved the Apostolic message and the words/deeds of Christ. But as we see today with the Supreme Court, having the words (of Scripture or the Constitution or any document for that matter) is not enough. The words must be lived which requires interpretation and then which interpretation best “conserves” the words becomes the issue of debate. Exact literalism is not always the best way to conserve/preserve the tradition because times change, and so we might be required also to change in order to best preserve the intent of the tradition. Simply conserving the tradition is not enough to enable a group to stay faithful to that tradition. The community must constantly interpret, constantly reflect on the word and on its behavior. Otherwise every “conservative” group will simply become the “Amish” – freezing itself in time and trying to conserve everything – language, dress, mannerisms, technology.